United States (501.9 million euros), United Kingdom (338.2 m€), Japan (270.8 m€), Germany (167.4 m€), and Italy (146.8 m€).
But this does not really tell us much, because the USA has 5 times as many people as the UK, and 2.5 times as many as Japan, so we expect greater imports of most things. So, this does not tell us much about the relative propensity for drinking Champagne, among these countries' denizens. What we need to do is look at how much the people are spending, individually. We do this by working out the price being paid per person, not per country.
My data for the population size of these countries comes from Worldometer. I simply divided the AAWE numbers by the Worldometer numbers. This leads to the country rankings shown in the graph. Each point represents one of the top 30 Champagne-importing countries, ranked horizontally by total value (million euros) and vertically as value per capita (euros per person).
The correlation between these two rankings is not high (0.25), indicating that the price per person is very high in some places, even if the total volume imported is small.
For example, note that the #1 importer (the USA) drops to 20th place per person, while Luxembourg jumps from 29th for total volume to 1st per person. Indeed, Luxembourgers spend 10 times as much on Champagne as those cheap Americans; and the Belgians and Swiss do not do too badly for themselves, either. The full list of per capita expenditure is included at the bottom of this post.
Note that other large importing countries also move down the rankings after accounting for population size, such as China. On the other hand, some smaller countries move up the list, notably Sweden, Denmark and Norway — those Scandinavians certainly do themselves well for sparkling wine.
Some countries hardly change ranking, of course, including Australia, the Netherlands, and Taiwan. Interestingly, the people of Hong Kong spend nearly twice as much per person on Champagne as do the Singaporeans. There might be a message there, although I am not sure what.
We could, of course, compare this per-capita Champagne list to the AAWE list of overall per-capita expenditure on wine. The latter list places most of the same countries at the top of the ranking, including Switzerland, Belgium, the Scandinavian countries, and the United Kingdom. However, Luxembourg is nowhere to be seen, and instead we have Slovenia. So, the Luxembourgers must specialize in Champagne, while the Slovenians apparently prefer some other sparkling wine, instead. Perhaps the Luxembourgers celebrate more often than do the rest of us? Perhaps there is something wrong with the local Crémant de Luxembourg?
Anyway, recent reports note that: Booming Champagne could reach pre-Covid levels by year-end, along with: Sparkling, pricier wines lead in retail sales. Unlike the rest of the wine industry, things seem to be looking reasonably good for the sparkling-wine makers in eastern France, even if those Champenois are annoyed with the Russians, just at the moment, and the organic farmers are having trouble with downy mildew.
Per capita expenditure on Champagne in 2020:
Country Luxembourg Belgium Switzerland Hong Kong Sweden Denmark United Kingdom Australia Norway Singapore Netherlands Austria Finland New Zealand Italy Japan Germany Ireland United Arab Emirates United States Canada Spain Portugal South Korea Taiwan South Africa Russia Mexico Nigeria China |
€ / person 14.70 12.20 10.87 6.13 5.32 5.10 4.96 4.89 3.64 3.32 2.94 2.84 2.60 2.52 2.43 2.15 1.99 1.93 1.85 1.51 1.38 1.28 0.88 0.57 0.55 0.26 0.24 0.12 0.06 0.03 |
That calculation (relative to the total population) doesn't make much sense. It would seem to me to be more interesting to put the value in relation to the imported volume (i.e. average price paid per bottle). Then you will see how much people are prepared to pay in each country.
ReplyDeleteCould also comment that many consider Luxembourg to be a country whose numbers should perhaps be excluded in this kind of comparison, since (for tax reason) many foreign neighbours go to Lux and buy and the go back home. Like all the Swedes who drive to Germany (or even Denmark) to buy cheap beer.
/Per
The calculation is fine, but would be better if the population size was "wine drinkers" or even "adults" rather than "everyone". However, the same bias applies to all countries, and so the relative numbers will be approximately right.
DeleteI do not have the data for the number of bottles readily available, in order to do your suggested calculation.
The tax situation for Luxembourg is even more complicated than is suggested by Per's comment. Vicky Corbeels also points out that many bottles are imported directly by the locals, since the source is not far away. The amount that they can bring in is 60 liters, without paying excise duty. So, it is likely that as much Champagne is brought in direct by consumers, as is officially imported. If this is the cheaper stuff, which is likely, then only the expensive stuff will appear in the official figures.
ReplyDelete