Monday, November 27, 2023

Is consuming wine really as unhealthy as tobacco?

The answer to that question that is currently being pushed by several lobby groups is: “yes”. I am not at all convinced by this answer, for several reasons that I will discuss in this post. (I am apparently not alone in this view: Why is moderate wine consumption being villainized in 2023?).

The main issue for me is that we are dealing with public health — that is, groups of people, rather than individuals. The claim is that wine is unhealthy for people as a whole. By contrast, one of the medical centers that I occasionally deal with, has as part of its stated Vision: we improve public health — one individual at a time (Swedish: förbättrar vi folkhälsan — en individ i taget). The current official medical pressure seems to be the opposite approach, for alcohol in general (WHO shifts its alcohol narratives, and the wine industry faces new challenges).

Tobacco and wine shop

Put simply, human health is a standard cost-benefit analysis. That is, for any given situation we explicitly lay out both the benefits and the costs, for everyone to be able to see and evaluate. We then compare those costs and benefits, to see how they balance each other. If the costs out-weigh the benefits then we would be best to change the situation; and if it is the other way around then we might leave things as they are. (As a practical example, see: Ag groups cheer court’s defense in science-based regulation of chlorpyrifos.)

Here is a simple cost-benefit analysis of the personal consumption of wine and tobacco.
Smoking tobacco
• few, except stress relief
• lung cancer causing mortality
• costs for people within breathing distance
Drinking wine
• J-curve of personal health: low consumption reduces risks
• social interactions (since we don't drink alone)
• J-curve of personal health: high consumption increases risks
• social costs of drunkenness and alcoholism

The J-curve of personal health with regard to wine drinking, referred to in this table, is discussed in my recent post: A scientist looks at alcohol and health, and is concerned. Basically, low consumption seems to have somewhat of a health benefit for wine drinking, but increased consumption definitely increases the personal health risks. That is, it is better for your body to drink small amounts regularly rather than to binge drink (‘Wine math’ is trending on TikTok). In particular, people who tend to drink little and often have a longer life expectancy than do those who guzzle or those who abstain (Why do moderate drinkers live longer than abstainers?).

There seems to be very little basis here for directly comparing smoking and drinking in terms of health costs and benefits. Mind you, George F. Koob (director of the US National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism) has suggested that: “recent research finds the health risks of alcohol outweigh any benefits.” For example, one reason for the J-curve is that alcohol seems to be protective against cardiovascular disease, while at the same time increasing the risk of death by other means, such as cancers and accidents (WHO lobbies EU lawmakers against watering down alcohol cancer risk).

Tobacco and wine sign

Nevertheless, smoking was banned in public because of a direct effect on humans even at low levels, and also on people nearby the smoker (chewing tobacco was excepted); * no such effect is know for low levels of alcohol consumption. Furthermore, given the social nature of wine drinking, the idea that banning it would have a good cost-benefit analysis is unlikely.

This has not stopped an increasing level of discussion, both ways (summarized in: Is alcohol the new tobacco?). Indeed, there have even been suggestions that the anti-alcohol lobby is taking us back in time (How much of a threat is the New Prohibitionist Movement?). These discussions are definitely worth reading. One outcome of interest is that a move towards healthier lifestyles by younger people is reducing alcohol consumption (Is Generation Z drinking less?), although apparently not in India (How do you tackle the Indian beverage alcohol market?).

Even wine label warnings should not be as dire as those for smoking. Nevertheless, some sort of label warning is probably inevitable for all alcoholic drinks, so wine-makers may need to get used to it (Concern among winemakers about potential new requirements for alcohol health warnings on bottles), just as they are now doing for other label requirements (New EU regulations for wine ingredients and nutritional labeling come into effect December 8). There are, however, potential health-warning issues for all of us (6 ways the new public health anti-alcohol warnings may affect consumers).

Associating wine and tobacco has a long history, even in the medical profession. We might, for example, remember When cigarette companies used doctors to push smoking. Even the Bollywood movies of India [Hindi cinema, based in Mumbai] associated the two: “a woman drinking wine [in Bollywood movies] was usually a vamp with a glass in one hand and a cigarette in the other, up to devious things.” So, I will end this post with two apt quotes.

First, we have George Bernard Shaw:
“A cigarette is a pinch of tobacco rolled in paper, with fire at one end and a fool at the other.”
Second, we have Robert Mondavi:
“We believe wine is the temperate, civilized, sacred, romantic mealtime beverage recommended in the Bible. It is a liquid food that has been part of civilization for 8,000 years. Wine has been praised for centuries by statesmen, scholars, poets, and philosophers. It has been used as a religious sacrament, as the primary beverage of choice for food, and as a source of pleasure and diversion. Wine is the natural beverage for every celebration:  the birth of a child, graduations, engagements, weddings, anniversaries, promotions, family gatherings, toasts between governments, and other festivities.”

* Note that vaping is an improvement, but people like me can still smell the tobacco.


  1. After two decades in the wine industry, it's clear: the health benefits of wine were oversold. We believed in the French paradox and the J-curve, marketing wine as a health necessity. Turns out, it was wishful thinking, not solid science. Several recent studies debunk these claims, showing no real health advantages from moderate drinking.

    The medical community never fully endorsed wine as healthy. The touted benefits were a marketing mirage, ignoring facts like the 'sick-quitter' effect. We've been misled by a lucrative narrative.

    So, let's drink wine for its taste and tradition, not for health myths. Claims of alcohol as a health booster? Pure fiction. Enjoy wine for what it is, not for false health promises.

    1. I have never accepted the idea that wine itself is necessarily healthy. However, under certain circumstances it can be part of a healthy (happy?) lifestyle. That is certainly an important part of its role for me.

    2. I'd always been told wine helps with digestion-- turns out that's totally untrue. The science behind the gut-brain connection is very new. We do know alcohol kills gut bacteria. Wine is "fermented" but the product "wine" is dead, unlike kombucha.